← Back to all fallacies

Quantifier-Shift Fallacy


Quantifier-Shift Fallacy




(also known as: illicit quantifier shift)


Description: A fallacy of reversing the order of two quantifiers.


Logical Form:


Every X has a related Y.


Therefore, there is some Y related to every X.


Example #1:


Everybody has a mother.


Therefore, there is some woman out there who is the mother of us all.


Explanation: While it is true that everyone has (or had) a mother, the term “mother” is not a singular term that is shared -- it is implied that it is a category in which many mothers reside.  The conclusion is asserting the opposite of the meaning -- that there is actually just one mother shared by everyone.  This form of reasoning is invalid; therefore, fallacious.


Example #2:


Everybody has a brain.


Therefore, there is a single brain we all share.


Explanation: Everybody has his or her own brain, not one we all share.  Although I have met many people who seem not to have their own brain.  This form of reasoning is invalid; therefore, fallacious.


Tip: Remember that a quantifier is an expression (e.g. all, some) that indicates the scope of a term to which it is attached.




References: {apa}



Cook, R. T. (2009). A Dictionary of Philosophical Logic. Edinburgh University Press.


{/apa}


Questions about this fallacy? Ask our community!
Book

Want the full book?

Get the complete guide to logical fallacies by Bo Bennett.

Buy the Book