Counter-argument that doesn't address argument?
Historical archive only. New interaction is disabled.
What logical fallacy is being committed when a counter-argument doesn't address the original argument? For example:
Alice: All primary colors are colors. Blue is a primary color. Therefore, blue is a color.
Bob: But some frogs are green!
Alice: All primary colors are colors. Blue is a primary color. Therefore, blue is a color.
Bob: But some frogs are green!