What do we mean by natural (When applied to the gay-debate)?
Historical archive only. New interaction is disabled.
It is oftentimes argued that homosexuality is not right because it is "against nature". What does this actually mean?
1. On the other hand we can see homosexuality among animals (is it natural?)
2. On the other hand humanbeings have (biologically speaking) two different sex organs, which (If examined) function correctly only if male and female have coitus (a matter of shape & function).
In a sense this argument is more teleological or functional. Should we even call it "natural"?
1. On the other hand we can see homosexuality among animals (is it natural?)
2. On the other hand humanbeings have (biologically speaking) two different sex organs, which (If examined) function correctly only if male and female have coitus (a matter of shape & function).
In a sense this argument is more teleological or functional. Should we even call it "natural"?